That's the same thing as host1.a.b.c.d.e.f.example.com, right?

I don't think there's any special case needed to find a common parent.

Scott K

On November 3, 2021 2:49:03 PM UTC, Douglas Foster 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Type=A, name=host1, domain=a.b.c.d e.f.example.com
>
>Assuming that we will be walking the top n levels, it is only an issue on
>long domain names.
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, 10:19 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Would you please provide a specific example where this would be needed?
>> I'm not sure I understand what you mean by resource record names that is
>> not a DNS domain.
>>
>> Scott K
>>
>> On November 3, 2021 10:53:07 AM UTC, Douglas Foster <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >The tree walk should address whether we do anything for domain-part names
>> >that are resource record names rather than DNS domains.   Such names
>> cannot
>> >be given a _dmarc. subdomain, so they cannot be given an exact-match DMARC
>> >policy.
>> >
>> >Always doing a one-level walk from the bottom would ensure that they can
>> >have a policy at the closest possible layer.
>> >
>> >On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 10:09 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It appears that Scott Kitterman  <[email protected]> said:
>> >> >4.  Common parent domain not marked PSD.  We could add a new tag to the
>> >> DMARC
>> >> >records for PSDs to indicate it's a PSD, so it's record shouldn't be
>> used
>> >> for
>> >> >alignment.  Getting this added to the literal handful of PSD records
>> that
>> >> >exist and specifying it should be used going forward is doable.  To
>> >> implement
>> >> >this approach should produce identical (modulo PSL errors and
>> omissions)
>> >> >results to the RFC 7489 approach.  It seems like we've decided to trust
>> >> that
>> >> >ICANN and ccTLD operators will effectively manage publication of PSL
>> >> records
>> >> >for policy discovery, so this leverages that trust to simplify
>> alignment
>> >> while
>> >> >maintaining backward compatibility.
>> >>
>> >> This is a much better worked out version of my DNS tree climbing
>> >> proposal.  I like it too.
>> >>
>> >> R's,
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >> PS: Just out of nosiness, what PSD records exist now?

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to