Back to Scott's original comment and Ale's skepticism: Is it feasible that DNS flags could provide a less-bad replacement for the PSL, or will it be just a different and maybe even less-reliable mess? If most are not under contract, how can we hope to get cooperation? Does the leadership or designated members of this group have a way to evaluate that question?
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Tobias Herkula <[email protected]> said: > >I'm aware of that, to be more explicit about my meaning. At least I > currently believe (I don't know) that there is a difference in buying > >the domain "mydomain.example" under the assumption that .example is a > gTLD, sTLD or ccTLD in comparison of buying a domain from ME, like > >"harharhar.mydomain.example". > > If you buy mydomain.broker.aero or mydomain.castle.museum or > mydomain.smith.name or mydomain.cpa.pro, you are buying it directly > from the ICANN contracted registry via a registrar so you are in the > same position as if you buy mydomain.org. If you buy mydomain.us.com > you are buying it from an ICANN contracted registry, but they don't > happen to have a contract about that 2LD. > > The public part of the PSL also has thousands of 2nd and 3rd level ccTLD > entries > where you get whatever you get from the ccTLD, none of which have > meaningful ICANN contracts. And as I said, the PSL is missing > a lot of 2LDs sold direct by the TLD registries. It is a mess and > it does not claim to be authoritative. > > R's, > John > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
