On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:14 PM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> Should we modify the definition of non-existent domains so that a domain > that > only has an RFC 7505 null mx record is still considered non-existent? > > I'll propose text if it's agreed this would be a useful change? > > Scott K > > This is a useful addition. 3.2.6 also says: This is a broader definition than that in [RFC8020]. But RFC8020 only defines "Denied name". I suggest This is a broader definition than what is defined as "Denied name" in [RFC8020].
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
