On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:14 PM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> Should we modify the definition of non-existent domains so that a domain
> that
> only has an RFC 7505 null mx record is still considered non-existent?
>
> I'll propose text if it's agreed this would be a useful change?
>
> Scott K
>
>
This is a useful addition.

3.2.6 also says:

This is a broader definition than that in [RFC8020].


But RFC8020 only defines "Denied name".  I suggest

This is a broader definition than what is defined as "Denied name" in
[RFC8020].
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to