On Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1:47:37 PM EST Dave Crocker wrote: > On 1/26/2022 10:38 AM, John R Levine wrote: > >>> It appears that Dave Crocker <[email protected]> said: > >>>> The method of finding the organizational domain should be specified > >>>> outside of the base DMARC specification. I suggested this back during > >>>> the PSD discussion. > >>> > >>> That assumes that the org domain is useful on its own, rather than > >>> just as a tool to help find policy records or to check for relaxed > >>> alignment. > >> > >> It does? I don't understand how it assumes that. > > > > If the org domain isn't useful, why would we care how it's defined? > > Well, now you've completely lost me. I have no idea what you are > talking about, nevermind how it it supposed to relate to the rather > simple point of distinction I suggested, separating what from how. > > >>> We tried and failed to find a general method to find an > >>> organizaional domain in DBOUND, and I don't think we want to go > >>> there again. > >> > >> So it's a good thing I didn't suggest anything of the sort. > > > > Could you explain in simple language that even I could understand how > > a generic definition of a way to find an org domain is not what DBOUND > > tried to do? > > Ahh, You are claiming I said something about a 'general method'. I > didn't. > > Since you think otherwise, could you explain in simple language that > even I could understand how you reached that interpretation of my note?
Or, not to put too fine a point on it, if you two want to discuss DBOUND, I think [email protected] is still active. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
