It appears that Dave Crocker <[email protected]> said: >Here is some alternative phrasing: > > For DMARC, an Organizational Domain can contain a DMARC record, to > be used as the default DMARC record for subordinate domains that do > not have a DMARC record of their own, and for subordinate domains > that do not exist.
That sounds right to me. >In that light, I'll renew my strong suggestion, from back in the days of >PSD development, that this core DMARC document NOT contain details or >sections devoted to PSD, in the style now shown in the current sections >3.2.8 - 3.2.10 Since a PSD can't be an organizational domain, I don't think that's going to work. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
