On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:11 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 3:29:33 AM EDT Robert wrote: > > > > Also I've noticed that the dmarc-uri definition seems to be missing > > the stuff about the file size limitation? At the moment it's just: > > dmarc-uri = URI > > ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas (ASCII > > ; 0x2C) and exclamation points (ASCII 0x21) > > ; MUST be encoded > > not sure what it should be. > > I'm not any kind of an ABNF expert, but adding the missing "u" for > dmarc-psd > is definitely correct and I believe the *WSP for dmarc-psd and dmarc-test > are > correct also. > > I would suggest those go into the next revision. Any suggestions on the > dmarc-uri question? > > I can put out a new revision today that includes Scott's proposed text for "Determination of the Organizational Domain for Relaxed Alignment" once we have something new suggested for the dmarc-uri ABNF. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
