It appears that Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said:
>I'm not any kind of an ABNF expert, but adding the missing "u" for dmarc-psd
>is definitely correct and I believe the *WSP for dmarc-psd and dmarc-test are
>correct also.
My inclination is to redo the ABNF to better match what
implementations actually do -- split the record up into tag=value pairs
and then interpret each value when used. So the ABNF would be
something like this:
dmarc-record = dmarc-version *WSP *(";" *WSP dmarc-tag) [ ";" ]
dmarc-tag = 1*ALPHA *WSP "=" *WSP dmarc-value *WSP
dmarc-value = 1*(%20-3a / %3c-7e) ; space and visible except semicolon
; in dmarc-value leading and trailing spaces are in the WSP, not the
value
Then define the specific syntax for the various values, and a rule that the "p"
tag
if it is present has to go first.
If people are OK with this I can make a stab at it over the weekend.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
