It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: >> You could make the argument that you "usually" find DMARC records at zone >> cuts, but that's relying on convention or happenstance rather than a >> standards-quality framework. > >I'd agree, except that our definition of Organizational Domain as one >label beyond a PSD (PSD+1) poses a semantic limit on that.
Sorry, but this is beyond wrong. A) Org domains are defined by what is in the draft, and that is not what the draft says. Some org domains will found below a PSD, most won't since most PSDs do not and will not publish DMARC records. B) PSDs have nothing to do with zone cuts. Some are at zone cuts, some are not. For example, .uk .co.uk and .org.uk are all in the PSL, and they are all in the same zone. >While we concentrate on existing scenarios, it may well happen that, >if DMARC algorithm sees widespread adoption, people will define >organizational boundaries that way, irrespective of actual DNS >control, as in your example. You appear to be saying that people will ignore the spec and do something else because they somehow imagine that we didn't mean what we said and really meant something else. Aw, come on. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
