On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:10 PM John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> I took a look and it looks to me like all the section references are
> >> there.  Which ones are missing?
> >
> > According to the diff provided on the web site [1], quite a few in the
> > following hunks of the diff:
>
> The section numbers are all there in the markdown and the XML, so it's a
> rendering problem somewhere.
>
> Todd, what version of xml2rfc are you using?  Are you submitting the
> rendered versions or just the XML?
>

$ xml2rfc --version
xml2rfc 2.44.0

I'm submitting just the XML that the Makefile produces from the .md file.

-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* [email protected]
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to