On Monday, December 19, 2022 10:43:12 AM EST Scott Kitterman wrote: > The RFC 9091 privacy considerations, with minor updates need to be > incorporated into the DMARCbis effort. Given the constraints on PSDs > requesting failure reports, they belong in the aggregate draft. I've opened > a PR to, with some light editing, pull them in: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/pull/1 > 5 > > I don't think it should be particularly controversial, since it's almost > exactly what the WG already agreed for RFC 9091, but people should review > it.
Similarly for the failure reporting draft: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting/pull/4 This is not based on RFC 9091, but aligns to what the current DMARCbis draft says. Please review. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
