On February 5, 2023 3:09:39 AM UTC, "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sounds good. Please @ me on the PR. If it's a significant change, we >> should bring it back here for discussion. > >Because I find git baffling, made some changes to the aggregate reporting >draft and then accidentally checked them into the main branch. Oh, well. > >It says PSDs only get nonexistent domain reports, and has some new security >considerations: > >https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/commit/a6609ae6ab6d413aae77c171375f81e2b62ba4e5 > >Take a look, tell me what seems wrong. Seems generally good. "non-existentl domain" needs fixing, but that's a nit. I've done the mailing list subscriber estimate trick too. Don't forget to clear out the note. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
- [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations For Aggreg... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations F... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations F... Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Consideratio... Emil Gustafsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Consider... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Consider... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Cons... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Consider... Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Cons... Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy... Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Pri... Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related... Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related... Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related... Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related... Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related... Douglas Foster
