Thanks folks, I’ll get this cleaned up for the next revision. I’m also trying to address the remaining tickets (most, if not all, have been addressed), and make sure they’re closed.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: dmarc <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steven M Jones Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 2:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Version in aggregate report On 3/9/23 11:45, Tomki Camp wrote: I think that's a good idea. Mike Jones from Fortra (ne Agari) also expressed concern during M3AAWG 57 about problems for data analysis to be able to determine how a specific receiver's result was achieved, with the discovery methodology doubling. An XML indication specifying the approach that the receiver used should help allay that concern. +1, including John's point about accommodating existing implementations. --S.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
