On Friday, March 10, 2023 6:12:45 PM EST Steven M Jones wrote: > On 3/10/23 3:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > although I'm back as an editor of the failure reporting I-D, that file > > is almost final and I can't think of anything to be discussed live > > about it. I haven't registered for 116. > > Off the top of my head, and in light of the aggregate reports getting a > field for the method of determining the Organizational Domain -- should > there be an optional field or provision for including this in a failure > report? > > Since it seems likely there are receivers who may reach different > dispositions based on this change, I think we might want to consider a > way to convey this for those who choose to send failure reports.
I don't think it's needed. My understanding is that failure reports aren't typically used as an aid to troubleshooting DMARC failures. The aggregate reports are sufficient for that. The failure reports have other information that's useful for other forensic purposes for which no one will care about the version of DMARC that led to the failure. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
