On March 14, 2023 10:41:12 PM UTC, Steven M Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 3/14/23 13:18, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> My expectation is that if you were able to contact the people who made that
>> decision, they'd say they did it because they want information on DMARC
>> failures, which is not what DMARC failure reports give you. They provide
>> details on messages which fail DMARC, not particularly about the DMARC
>> failure.
>>
>> The naming is a bit misleading, but I don't propose we change it.
>
>
>Granted that you aren't proposing a change, I'm very curious as to what name
>you feel would be more accurate...
>
I haven't really thought about it, but I've always thought that it was odd that
if I want to learn about why messages are failing DMARC, the message called a
DMARC failure report is not the one I want. I understand that there are
historical reasons for this.
Maybe DMARC domain results report for the aggregate report and DMARC additional
message data report for the failure report.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
