On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:28 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> > I think we've had this discussion before. This argument reduces to: "I > do > > not like what structured mailing lists, which have been around since the > > '90s at least, do with messages, and I now insist that they change their > > practices to meet what I perceive to be my requirements." > > I've been smoking on flights since the 70s and now it's forbidden. Where > I > live was a two-way street since ever and now it's one way. Rules change > according to changed needs. > That's a curious tactic since one of the arguments around banning smoking is collateral damage to people not participating in that activity. That appears to describe DMARC pretty well. > Rather than waving an obscure MUST NOT, why don't we narrate the story as > it > went, what was the intent with ADSP and early DMARC, what some large > providers > did, what the reaction was, what perspectives are there now? > How about both? -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
