On 4/15/2023 4:39 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On April 15, 2023 8:17:41 PM UTC, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
I would like a pony, too. But ARC is as good as we have now and
after a decade of beating our heads against the wall, I don't think
we're going to find anything better. I've suggested a bunch of
things that would make lists' life better, and nobody is interested:
Agreed.
If someone has a great idea for a third way in email authentication, they
should develop the idea, get some deployment experience, and then document the
protocol. After that would come the question of adding it to DMARC. This is
not the working group to do that work.
ARC is overhead junk to reach a more optimized solution with a TPA
(Third Party Authorization) protocol. Anyone. Pick one.
Maybe we should add an optional new SPF directive
-DMARC:5322.From.domain
To help resolve this problem DMARC discovery issues at SMTP?
ARC is junk. Why is it IETF perpetuated is beyond me. Soon we will
I-D proposals to clean up this massive overhead.
--
HLS
--
Hector Santos,
https://santronics.com
https://winserver.com
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
