Hector Santos skrev den 2023-04-17 20:55:
Just consider your message source. The header overhead is massively
complex to read. It is really a waste on receivers.
Apr 17 22:53:28.015 [22350] dbg: authres: parsing
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass
(1024-bit key) header.d=isdg.net header.b="LJSFN/J6"; dkim=pass
(1024-bit key) header.d=beta.winserver.com header.b="x/bRVx9h"
Apr 17 22:53:28.015 [22350] dbg: authres: parsing
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass
header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com;
dmarc=pass policy=reject author.d=isdg.net signer.d=beta.winserver.com
(atps signer);
Apr 17 22:53:28.016 [22350] dbg: authres: skipping header, missing
property: =reject author.d=isdg.net signer.d=beta.winserver.com (atps
signer);
Apr 17 22:53:28.016 [22350] dbg: authres: results: dkim=pass
pq6xadozsi47rluiq5yohg2hy3mvjyoo._atps TXT ("v=atps01; d=ietf.org;")
added and thanks if succces :)
[3] https://winserver.com/public/wcDmarc
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
