On Tue 18/Apr/2023 00:48:30 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
Hector Santos skrev den 2023-04-17 20:55:
One solution is for the junc.eu domain to add an ATPS authorization
record for ietf.org [1] to the junc.eu [2] zone:
pq6xadozsi47rluiq5yohg2hy3mvjyoo._atps TXT ("v=atps01; d=ietf.org;")
retest
What's the point of wearing an atps record if it's not called out in a DKIM
signature? (I wouldn't have tested it anyway).
What's the point of ARC-sealing a message which is not arrived from an external
ADMD?
I'm rather happy with the amount of gibberish I currently get. For this
Benny's message it was:
Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org;
dkim=pass reason="transformed" header.d=junc.eu;
dkim=pass (whitelisted) header.d=ietf.org
header.b=yiVUz1hG (ietf1);
dkim=pass (whitelisted) header.d=ietf.org
header.b=yiVUz1hG (ietf1);
arc=fail (1 set(s)) smtp.remote-ip=50.223.129.194
Received-SPF: none (Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework)
SPF=HELO;
sender=mail.ietf.org;
remoteip=50.223.129.194;
remotehost=mail.ietf.org;
helo=mail.ietf.org;
receiver=wmail.tana.it;
Received-SPF: pass (Address passes the Sender Policy Framework)
SPF=MAILFROM;
[email protected];
remoteip=50.223.129.194;
remotehost=mail.ietf.org;
helo=mail.ietf.org;
receiver=wmail.tana.it;
Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [50.223.129.194])
(TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384)
by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPS
id 00000000005DC0F0.00000000643DCCEC.00004A7D; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:49:15 +0200
Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it;
dnswl=pass dns.zone=list.dnswl.org
policy.ip=127.0.9.2
policy.txt="ietf.org https://dnswl.org/s/?s=1703";
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B53AC17B344
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
