Barry, Can you add pointers to the various text options (perhaps links to the mailing list archive) so we’re all working off the same text? And which is the “current text”?
-Jim On 6 Jul 2023, at 8:00, Barry Leiba wrote: > Below is the agenda I am posting for the session at IETF 117. > Comments, changes, and additions are welcome; please post them here. > > Barry > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > DMARC working group session at IETF 117 > Friday, 28 July, 2023 — 12:00-13:30 PDT (UTC-7) > > - Introduction and administration > - Document status > > - Discussion of p=reject: > - What’s needed to deal with the indirect mail flow problems? > - Options currently open: > - No change to current text > - Move ARC to Standards Track (need more data) > - Scott Kitterman’s proposed text > - Barry Leiba’s proposed text (new Interoperability Considerations > section) > - AD will call consensus on this issue > > - Discussion of SPF use in DMARC > - There was a proposal to remove SPF from DMARC > - The proposal is *only* related to use of SPF *in DMARC* > - Options currently open: > - No change to current text > - Simply remove SPF from DMARC consideration > - Add a DMARC record tag to specify use of SPF, DKIM, or either > - Do we also add “both must align”? > > - Any other business > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
