List links added. Barry
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 2:15 PM Jim Fenton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Barry, > > Can you add pointers to the various text options (perhaps links to the > mailing list archive) so we’re all working off the same text? And which is > the “current text”? > > -Jim > > On 6 Jul 2023, at 8:00, Barry Leiba wrote: > > > Below is the agenda I am posting for the session at IETF 117. > > Comments, changes, and additions are welcome; please post them here. > > > > Barry > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > DMARC working group session at IETF 117 > > Friday, 28 July, 2023 — 12:00-13:30 PDT (UTC-7) > > > > - Introduction and administration > > - Document status > > > > - Discussion of p=reject: > > - What’s needed to deal with the indirect mail flow problems? > > - Options currently open: > > - No change to current text > > - Move ARC to Standards Track (need more data) > > - Scott Kitterman’s proposed text > > - Barry Leiba’s proposed text (new Interoperability Considerations > > section) > > - AD will call consensus on this issue > > > > - Discussion of SPF use in DMARC > > - There was a proposal to remove SPF from DMARC > > - The proposal is *only* related to use of SPF *in DMARC* > > - Options currently open: > > - No change to current text > > - Simply remove SPF from DMARC consideration > > - Add a DMARC record tag to specify use of SPF, DKIM, or either > > - Do we also add “both must align”? > > > > - Any other business > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmarc mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
