On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 6:13 AM Dotzero <dotz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> No. I think this section is currently, correctly, focused on what to do >> with only references to why. I don't think we should change that. If the >> current references are inadequate, then we should improve them, not attempt >> to restate them. >> >> I don't think "other knowledge" is limited to content filtering and your >> attempt to be more precise is problematic because it doesn't actually >> achieve the goal. >> >> "The combined effort of Mail Receivers and Forwarders ...", for example, >> leaves out mailing lists, which is one of the things you said you were >> trying to solve. >> >> Scott K >> > > I agree with Scott. >
+1. I think the proposed text adds a lot of words but not much new content; the result is a less crisp expression of essentially the same thing. -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
