-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <CAL0qLwZ_yLjfTXY=miQ5jo6+TsPaCveBq8MxyppH- itmybn...@mail.gmail.com>, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> writes
> Do you really want to be pushing that information and decision > burden onto users? How many of them will understand versus > ignoring it and just blundering ahead? I think that depends how clearly the information is presented > The operator is making the decision to publish or enforce, not the > user. Looking at $DAYJOB$ logs for this week I see a shade under 300 people who are participating in IETF working groups using p=reject addresses. I believe they have made an informed decision as to what email address they will use and have not "blundered" at all (in fact a couple look as if they have set up the email address specially in order to participate. (that was easy to count and it seemed relevant to do so, counting other mailing lists is complex) There are 5 or so in this group... Surely you are not going to ask them to leave. - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a Benjamin little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Franklin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBZTlDEd2nQQHFxEViEQLOowCg0paP4kt9wbajuJ4tKO+uY/G6BoYAoJry +RxYXsHtHSMV+KgNQP87805W =zUUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
