On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 1:38 PM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> I'm starting this in a separate thread that I want to keep for ONLY > the following question: > > Do we want to use the session we have scheduled at IETF 118 to talk > about the issue that clearly is still in discussion about adding a tag > to specify which authentication mechanism(s) to use when evaluating > DMARC? > > Or shall I cancel the 118 session and just let the discussion continue > on the mailing list? > > And being clear here: the "eliminate SPF entirely" suggestion is > definitely out, failing rough consensus. We're *only* talking about > the suggestion to add a tag to specify what the sender wants. > > Barry > Let the discussion continue on the list. Personally I think there has been enough discussion that there can be a call for consensus. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
