I was personally planning to go to the IETF-118 specifically for the DMARC meeting. In the end, many other activities caught my eye. However, if any of you are going to the IETF, I'd be happy to share a few words about DMARC and put a face to your e-mail addresses.
Regards, Olivier De: "Barry Leiba" <barryle...@computer.org> À: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org> Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Novembre 2023 23:20:46 Objet: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC session at IETF 118 The sense I’m getting is to cancel the session in Prague. I’ll do that tomorrow (Thursday) morning SFO time unless someone screams loudly with a convincing reason that we need to keep the session. Barry On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 10:38 AM Barry Leiba < [ mailto:barryle...@computer.org | barryle...@computer.org ] > wrote: I'm starting this in a separate thread that I want to keep for ONLY the following question: Do we want to use the session we have scheduled at IETF 118 to talk about the issue that clearly is still in discussion about adding a tag to specify which authentication mechanism(s) to use when evaluating DMARC? Or shall I cancel the 118 session and just let the discussion continue on the mailing list? And being clear here: the "eliminate SPF entirely" suggestion is definitely out, failing rough consensus. We're *only* talking about the suggestion to add a tag to specify what the sender wants. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
