It appears that Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> said: >Hi Folks, > >As DMARCbis is being updated, I would like to suggest a new tag `required` >shorted to `req`. > >``` >`req=dkim`: requires DKIM, messages not properly signed are then to be >rejected/quarantined based on 'p' policy. > >The tag should allow future expansion by requiring multiple mechanisms to be >required by specifying >multiple mechanisms separate, e.g. with `req=dkim,spf`. ...
Unless something important has changed since the last time we took up and rejected this idea, I don't think we need to discuss it further. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
