On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:12 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Section 5.3, in the format description of psd: > > n: The DMARC policy record is published for a PSD, but it is the > Organizational Domain for itself and its subdomain. There is > no need to put psd=n in a DMARC record, except in the very > unusual case of a parent PSD publishing a DMARC record without > the requisite psd=y tag. > > Perhaps a "not" is missing between "is" and "published"? I'd just say > the > domain is not a PSD /and/ it is the Organizational Domain for itself and > its subdomain. > > You may be correct in your assertion here; I'll wait for others to weigh in. In the meantime, Issue 126 has been opened to track this. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *p:* 703-220-4153 *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
