On March 5, 2024 8:10:46 PM UTC, Todd Herr <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On March 5, 2024 2:47:47 PM UTC, Todd Herr <todd.herr= >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:12 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Section 5.3, in the format description of psd: >> >> >> >> n: The DMARC policy record is published for a PSD, but it is the >> >> Organizational Domain for itself and its subdomain. There is >> >> no need to put psd=n in a DMARC record, except in the very >> >> unusual case of a parent PSD publishing a DMARC record without >> >> the requisite psd=y tag. >> >> >> >> Perhaps a "not" is missing between "is" and "published"? I'd just say >> >> the >> >> domain is not a PSD /and/ it is the Organizational Domain for itself and >> >> its subdomain. >> >> >> >> >> >You may be correct in your assertion here; I'll wait for others to weigh >> in. >> > >> >In the meantime, Issue 126 has been opened to track this. >> > >> >> I think it's missing a not, but is overwise fine. >> >> >John Levine commented directly on issue 126 ><https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/126>, >indicating that he believes the text should read (emphasis added by me): > > n: The DMARC policy record is published for a PSD, but it is NOT the > Organizational Domain for itself and its subdomain. There is > no need to put psd=n in a DMARC record, except in the very > unusual case of a parent PSD publishing a DMARC record without > the requisite psd=y tag. > >I think this is the correct place to put the 'not', as it's consistent with >the second sentence here, as well as this text from the following sections: > >4.8 Organizational Domain Discovery - "If a valid DMARC record contains the >psd= tag set to 'n' (psd=n), this is the Organizational Domain, and the >selection process is complete." > >11.8 Determination of Organizational Domain for Relaxed Alignment - "If a >PSD domain publishes a DMARC record without the appropriate psd=y tag, >organizational domain owners can add psd=n to their organizational domain's >DMARC record so that the PSD record will not be incorrectly evaluated to be >the organizational domain." > I agree.
Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
