On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Todd Herr <todd.herr=
[email protected]> wrote:

> The text reported in the erratum doesn't really exist in DMARCbis; it's
> been replaced by the DNS Tree Walk (
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.html#name-dns-tree-walk
> )
>
> Are we to issue an actual update to RFC 7489 here as well?
>

No, but I think you need to (or should) list any errata against RFC 7489
that we consider this document to have resolved.  That would include this
one if the section has been rewritten or the issue is fully obsolete.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to