On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:02 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Todd Herr <todd.herr= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The text reported in the erratum doesn't really exist in DMARCbis; it's >> been replaced by the DNS Tree Walk ( >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.html#name-dns-tree-walk >> ) >> >> Are we to issue an actual update to RFC 7489 here as well? >> > > No, but I think you need to (or should) list any errata against RFC 7489 > that we consider this document to have resolved. That would include this > one if the section has been rewritten or the issue is fully obsolete. > > Thank you. I have opened Issue 129 to cover adding text that discusses errata from https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7489 that have been addressed in DMARCbis. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *p:* 703-220-4153 *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
