John Levine writes: > It appears that Todd Herr <[email protected]> said: > >I agree that clarifying it can't hurt, obviously, ... > > I disagree, it does hurt. > > If we say you're allowed to use CNAMEs to point to DMARC records, > people are to say uh oh, is there something special here? What about > DKIM records? what about SPF records? how about SPF includes? or SPF > redirects? > > Really, there is nothing to say here, so let's not say it.
We could add an example Appendix B that uses CNAME, so that would give indication, yes of course you can use CNAMEs, without explicitly adding text that might cause confusion. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
