On Saturday, March 16, 2024 4:52:54 AM EDT Tero Kivinen wrote: > John Levine writes: > > It appears that Todd Herr <[email protected]> said: > > >I agree that clarifying it can't hurt, obviously, ... > > > > I disagree, it does hurt. > > > > If we say you're allowed to use CNAMEs to point to DMARC records, > > people are to say uh oh, is there something special here? What about > > DKIM records? what about SPF records? how about SPF includes? or SPF > > redirects? > > > > Really, there is nothing to say here, so let's not say it. > > We could add an example Appendix B that uses CNAME, so that would give > indication, yes of course you can use CNAMEs, without explicitly > adding text that might cause confusion.
I think we have more important things to spend our time on. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
