On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
How about:
"(::ffff:)?(([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.){3}([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])"/>
Testing yielded a correct fix:
"(::[Ff]{4}:)?(([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.){3}([01]?\d?\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])"/>
There are lots of other ways to write it, e.g.
::00:ffff:12.34.56.78
0:0:0:0:0:0:ffff:012.034.056.078
and they're actually IPv6 addresses. Just take it out, if nobody has
tried to use this form in the past decade, they won't use it now.
Please take my pull request.
Please take out the grammar change.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
