It appears that Todd Herr <[email protected]> said: >Issue 144 has been opened for the question of what to say about ARC (RFC >8617) in the context of indirect mail flows, a la Murray's example text >from this post ><https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/v5NMVIZqvRuEfopf7gc0Q1i4Ywo/>: > >"One possible mitigation to problem X is [ARC], which provides for a >mechanism to demonstrate 'chain-of-custody' of a message. However, use of >ARC is nascent, as is industry experience with it in connection with DMARC."
Generally OK but nascent seems wrong for something that was published five years ago. How about "ARC has found limited acceptance in the industy so it is unclear how much help it will provide in practice." R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
