On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:03 AM Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think details about the technique to which you're alluding, especially >> with real world examples, anecdotes, or other data, would be really >> valuable to publish somewhere, be that in this document or elsewhere. Even >> just a paragraph that explains what ARC brings that we didn't have before, >> that can be used to mitigate DMARC damage, would be a step in the right >> direction. >> >> The ARC usage document appears to have been parked and expired, so that >> advice doesn't seem to exist anywhere now. Is the plan to revive that, now >> that we appear to have at least one source of experience? >> > > At M3AAWG a month ago, a couple of major mailboxes agreed to share their > experience (and success) with ARC to this list. It is apparently making a > significant difference for their systems. Getting that data public is still > slow moving. > That would be really interesting to see. Since you have seen it, what's your view on whether such material is a viable input to this WGLC? Should we wait for it? -MSK, p11g
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
