On May 13, 2024 7:59:20 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >someone objected to PSDs being unable to receive failure reports even if the >PSD is the From: domain. For example: > >_dmarc.psd.example IN TXT "p=none psd=y [email protected] > >In case a mail having "From: [email protected]" fails DMARC, couldn't the >receiver generate a failure report? > >draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10 currently says: > > Report generators MUST NOT consider ruf= tags in records having > a "psd=y" tag, unless there are specific agreements between the > interested parties. > >instead, it could say: > > Report generators MUST NOT consider ruf= tags in records having > a "psd=y" tag, unless the domain is the RFC5322.From domain and/ > or there are specific agreements between the interested parties. > >However, draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis#section-10.2 says: > > DMARC records for multi-organizational PSDs MUST NOT include > the ruf= tag. > >Opinions?
I think that 10.2 should stay as is. I don't know how common it will be that PSDs send mail. I think your proposed change is fine as far as the reasons the current restrictions are there. It does, however, make things a little more complicated. Is this important enough to add implementation complexity for all implementers? Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
