It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: > >>instead, it could say: >> >> Report generators MUST NOT consider ruf= tags in records having >> a "psd=y" tag, unless the domain is the RFC5322.From domain and/ >> or there are specific agreements between the interested parties.
No. You can always do whatever you want if you have a private agreement. There is no reason to put language about that in any standard. >>However, draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis#section-10.2 says: >> >> DMARC records for multi-organizational PSDs MUST NOT include >> the ruf= tag. >> >>Opinions? That seems fine. In the particular case of gov.au I would not call that a multi-organization PSD. We were thinking of things like uk.com where the subzones have no relation to the PSD other than paying them money. R"s, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
