According to Todd Herr <[email protected]>: >So RFC 7489 allows for something like "fo=0:d:s" while DMARCbis allows only >"fo=0", "fo=1", OR "fo=d", "fo=s", or "fo=d:s" > >What is the consensus of the group here?
Given how few people generate failure reports, I'd leave it as is. >Second question... > >Both RFC 7489 and DMARCbis describe the 'd' and 's' values as requesting >the generation of a DKIM failure report (RFC 6651) or SPF failure report >(RFC 6652). Is that what we want, or should it be a report in the format >defined in draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting? Given how few people generate failure reports, I'd leave it as is. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
