On June 22, 2024 1:43:45 AM UTC, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >According to Todd Herr <[email protected]>: >>So RFC 7489 allows for something like "fo=0:d:s" while DMARCbis allows only >>"fo=0", "fo=1", OR "fo=d", "fo=s", or "fo=d:s" >> >>What is the consensus of the group here? > >Given how few people generate failure reports, I'd leave it as is. > >>Second question... >> >>Both RFC 7489 and DMARCbis describe the 'd' and 's' values as requesting >>the generation of a DKIM failure report (RFC 6651) or SPF failure report >>(RFC 6652). Is that what we want, or should it be a report in the format >>defined in draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting? > >Given how few people generate failure reports, I'd leave it as is.
Agreed. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
