On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
>Thanks for the review.
>
>On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote:
...
>> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the
>> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as 
>> written..."
>> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that experiment.
>
>I don't think there are any.  They were observations by the author of the RFC.
>

We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame the 
need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being 
experimental.

Scott K

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to