On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks for the review. > >On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: ... >> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the >> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as >> written..." >> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that experiment. > >I don't think there are any. They were observations by the author of the RFC. >
We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame the need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being experimental. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
