Hi,

Thank you for addressing my comments.

I’m fine with what Scott proposed.

Regards,

Ines

On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 3:39 AM Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> wrote:

>
>
> On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <jo...@iecc.com>
> wrote:
> >Thanks for the review.
> >
> >On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote:
> ...
> >> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the
> >> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as
> written..."
> >> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that
> experiment.
> >
> >I don't think there are any.  They were observations by the author of the
> RFC.
> >
>
> We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame
> the need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being
> experimental.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> last-call mailing list -- last-c...@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to