Hi, Thank you for addressing my comments.
I’m fine with what Scott proposed. Regards, Ines On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 3:39 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On December 4, 2024 7:18:23 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >Thanks for the review. > > > >On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > ... > >> 6-Appendix C.3: Related to "...That RFC was an Experimental RFC, and the > >> results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as > written..." > >> It would be nice to add some references to the results of that > experiment. > > > >I don't think there are any. They were observations by the author of the > RFC. > > > > We could also say something like the tree walk design in DMARCbis overcame > the need for a PSD DMARC registry, which was the issue that led to it being > experimental. > > Scott K > > -- > last-call mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
