It appears that Daniel K. <[email protected]> said: >The "sp" element is defined as REQUIRED in the current XSD. I think this >is for no good reason, and looking through the reports I receive, I see >that just over 30% of reports lack the required "sp" element. > >Should we take the opportunity to make it an optional element?
That makes sense. As much as we can, I'd like the grammar to match the reports people actually receive. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
