On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 1:28 PM Daniel K. <[email protected]> wrote: > Both documents contain the same section: > > Feedback Report Header Fields Registry Update > > > dmarcbis contains: > > The following has been added to the "Feedback Report Header Fields" > registry: > > In a table format: > > Field Name: Identity-Alignment > Description: indicates whether the message about which a > report is being generated had any identifiers > in alignment > Multiple Appearances: No > Related "Feedback-Type": auth-failure > Reference: [this document] > Status: current > > > failure reporting contains: > > IANA is requested to change the "Identity-Alignment" entry in the > "Feedback Report Header Fields" registry to refer to this document. > > > dmarcbis says nothing else about Identity-Alignment, it is defined in > failure reporting, so I suppose the section should be removed from > dmarcbis. >
My sense is to move "8.3. Feedback Report Header Fields Registry Update" from dmarc-bis to dmarc-failure-reporting but in all honesty I would email IANA and walk them through it and ask them their thoughts. tim > > Daniel K. > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
