On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 12:18 John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >The IESG is processing this document today, and one question came up: > > > >Does the reference to RFC 7489 need to be normative? Do you need that > >document to implement this one? > > The intention is that the new documents replace 7489. In particular, > we designed the tree walk so that it will get the same result as the > old PSL lookup in nearly every case, so you don't need to keep the > old scheme. > > R's, > John > > PS: there's a longer discussion about how important the few cases are > where the result is different but the tl;dr is "not very"
+1 S, participating > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
