Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-28: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 7, paragraph 0 > 7. Security Considerations I wanted to thank Dhruv for his OPSDIR review. I agree with the issues he points out, and would like to see a resolution of his comments. Others have already provided feedback on issues such as the use of acronyms without any expansion, identifiers such as 'p' or 'sp' that have not been defined except in the examples, and other comments that I am not going to repeat here. The IANA review of this document seems to not have concluded yet. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
