And I was observing that effective anti-abuse strategies only require
notification of actual abuse.

Banks may have  curiosity about whether their staff are participating in
mailing lists, but it is not encumbent on others to provide data which they
can collect themselves by comparing inbound and outbound traffic flows

But the real problem here is that John denies that anti-abuse is a valid
purpose of failure reporting.   By declaring configuration management to be
the only valid purpose, and knowing that redaction undermines DKIM
debugging, he achieves his goal of undermining failure reoorting.

Michael has provided compelling arguments that failure reporting has
usefulness for anti-abuse.  It is bizarre that we have to justify why an
abuse detection system is useful for abuse response.

The draft in our hands is innocuous and preserves the established
functionality.  It could be sent for publication at any time, and could
have been sent previously.  It has been obstructed by those who want to see
it killed but can provide no evidence of harm from the status quo, as such
harm is unlikely in theory and unprovable in practice.  Their solution has
been to deny any benefit and to ignore evidence presented.  As long as the
chairs consider that to be a form of collaboration, the document will die
from lack of consensus and they will get their way.

Doug

On Mon, Jul 7, 2025, 7:37 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:

> On Sun 06/Jul/2025 16:58:53 +0200 Dotzero wrote:
> > I'd also point out that both Douglas and Ale are assuming (no supporting
> data
> > presented) that their personal experience and beliefs reflect the
> experience
> > and needs of others.
>
>
> I only said failures reports due to mailing list or similar forwarding are
> useless.  I don't think this needs supporting data.  It is a well known
> fact,
> confirmed by the personal experience of all of us.
>
>
> Best
> Ale
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to