I think Andy will be reasonable about it all. His point stands, that we have to finish up and not stall and sputter. I think we’re on the right track, and it’s on me, as chair, to make sure we move ahead.
Barry On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 3:29 AM Steven M Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/6/25 14:11, Andy Newton wrote: > > > > If my calculations are correct, this document must be submitted to the > > IESG in 30 days. Given there must be WGLC before submitting the doc, I > > hope any pending issues can be wrapped up in just a few days. > > Which would be November 6th? > > Not trying to be cute, but when I check the Charter states/history it > indicates that -03 was approved on June 5th. Does the six month timer > start from one of the earlier submission dates, like June 13th for > revision -02? Or do we need to allow 30 days for external reviews before > IESG gets it? > > I would certainly rather see it submitted to IESG by November 6th than > even a day later, but I see some review threads that appear to still be > open... Just trying to understand if we've already blown the deadline or > not. > > --S. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
