On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 9:15 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> The I-D does not actually need to be published. It is enough that it be > developed enough to provide a basis for deprecating ARC. > > I-Ds are sufficiently archival to be available for later reference. > Procedurally, I agree. But it seems from Trent's comments that the industry would actually benefit from an assertion, in the form of an RFC, that there's nothing left of value down that road. If that's true, I think it's worth the cost. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
