std.stdio is failing unit tests on Windows. Behaves the same way with
2.048, so it's a Phobos issue, not a compiler bug. Maybe another
appender issue?
--------------------
unittest
[email protected](549): unittest failure
object.except...@std\file.d(1429): Trailing characters at the end of line: `
'
--------------------
On 27 August 2010 15:39, Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I realized that I broke this right away and fixed it, but I forgot to check
> in.
> Try again now:
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1934
>
> -Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Rainer Schuetze <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> I think Walter has just committed a fix for this. See
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4302
>>
>> I could not verify it yet, because the current dmd/phobos combination
>> causes an error for me
>>
>> std\xml.d(373): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
>> (result.data()) of type string to char[]
>> std\xml.d(1148): Error: template instance std.xml.encode!(char[]) error
>> instantiating
>>
>> This seems to have to crept in with the recent Appender changes.
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> > Hello Rainer,
>> >
>> > Catching up with my email backlog. Was there a fix on this issue?
>> >
>> > Andrei
>> >
>> > On 6/11/10 11:30 PDT, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I've tried to untangle the startsWith code, and here's the minimal test
>> >> case I could come up with so far:
>> >>
>> >> ///////////////////////
>> >> template binaryFunImpl(bool b)
>> >> {
>> >> template Body()
>> >> {
>> >> static assert(b);
>> >> alias bool BodyType;
>> >> }
>> >> alias Body!().BodyType ReturnType; // line 9
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(true ).ReturnType)) {
>> >> return 1; }
>> >> uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(false).ReturnType)) {
>> >> return 0; } // line 13
>> >>
>> >> const uint var = startsWith(1);
>> >> ///////////////////////
>> >> dmd produces:
>> >>
>> >> test.d(6): Error: static assert (b) is false
>> >> test.d(9): instantiated from here: Body!()
>> >> test.d(13): instantiated from here: binaryFunImpl!(false)
>> >>
>> >> The error does not show up if var is not const. Also, dmd 2.032 to 2.045
>> >> do not produce this error (2.046 fails), so it must be some compiler
>> >> regression.
>> >>
>> >> As it seems, the compile time evaluation of startsWith uses the wrong
>> >> specialization. Maybe, it is just not gagging error output?
>> >>
>> >> Any other ideas? I have not yet dived too deep into the template code of
>> >> the compiler, but if nobody has a better clue (and time), I can give it
>> >> a try.
>> >>
>> >> Rainer
>> >>
>> >> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> >>> Thanks. It may take a while before I can tend to this. Could someone
>> >>> else look at it?
>> >>>
>> >>> Andrei
>> >>>
>> >>> On 06/10/2010 12:53 PM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>> >>>> Sorry, but it still doesn't work. The error occurs when the expression
>> >>>> is evaluated at compile time, so the code added to the unittest
>> >>>> does not
>> >>>> cover the issue.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Rainer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> >>>>> Apologies. svn up should fix it, and bring some more goodies too :o).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Andrei
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 06/10/2010 10:14 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>> >>>>>> const bool fails = startsWith("ab", "a");
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> >>>>> [email protected]
>> >>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ; _______________________________________________
>> >>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> >>>> [email protected]
>> >>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> dmd-beta mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dmd-beta mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
