Suggestion: you may want to use wine for your Windows unittests. To
build using wine, do this:
$ make -f posix.mak OS=win32wine unittest
That will build and unittest both debug and release.
Andrei
On 8/27/10 10:29 PDT, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
Fixed:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1935
-Steve
----- Original Message ----
From: Don Clugston<[email protected]>
To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D<[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 10:22:03 AM
Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta
std.stdio is failing unit tests on Windows. Behaves the same way with
2.048, so it's a Phobos issue, not a compiler bug. Maybe another
appender issue?
--------------------
unittest
[email protected](549): unittest failure
object.except...@std\file.d(1429): Trailing characters at the end of line: `
'
--------------------
On 27 August 2010 15:39, Steve Schveighoffer<[email protected]> wrote:
I realized that I broke this right away and fixed it, but I forgot to check
in.
Try again now:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1934
-Steve
----- Original Message ----
From: Rainer Schuetze<[email protected]>
Hi Andrei,
I think Walter has just committed a fix for this. See
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4302
I could not verify it yet, because the current dmd/phobos combination
causes an error for me
std\xml.d(373): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
(result.data()) of type string to char[]
std\xml.d(1148): Error: template instance std.xml.encode!(char[]) error
instantiating
This seems to have to crept in with the recent Appender changes.
Rainer
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello Rainer,
> Catching up with my email backlog. Was there a fix on this issue?
Andrei
> On 6/11/10 11:30 PDT, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to untangle the startsWith code, and here's the minimal
test
case I could come up with so far:
///////////////////////
template binaryFunImpl(bool b)
{
template Body()
>> {
static assert(b);
alias bool BodyType;
}
alias Body!().BodyType ReturnType; // line 9
}
>>
uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(true ).ReturnType)) {
return 1; }
uint startsWith(A)(A a) if (is(binaryFunImpl!(false).ReturnType)) {
>> return 0; } // line 13
const uint var = startsWith(1);
///////////////////////
dmd produces:
>>
test.d(6): Error: static assert (b) is false
test.d(9): instantiated from here: Body!()
test.d(13): instantiated from here: binaryFunImpl!(false)
The error does not show up if var is not const. Also, dmd 2.032 to
2.045
do not produce this error (2.046 fails), so it must be some compiler
regression.
>> As it seems, the compile time evaluation of startsWith uses the wrong
specialization. Maybe, it is just not gagging error output?
Any other ideas? I have not yet dived too deep into the template code
of
the compiler, but if nobody has a better clue (and time), I can give
it
a try.
Rainer
>>
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Thanks. It may take a while before I can tend to this. Could someone
else look at it?
>>>
Andrei
>>>
On 06/10/2010 12:53 PM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Sorry, but it still doesn't work. The error occurs when the
expression
is evaluated at compile time, so the code added to the unittest
does not
cover the issue.
>>>>
Rainer
>>>>
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Apologies. svn up should fix it, and bring some more goodies too
:o).
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>> On 06/10/2010 10:14 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>>>>> const bool fails = startsWith("ab", "a");
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>>>
; _______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
