Very cool. Thanks a lot!

I'll comment on 4092 in the bug report.

Rainer

Walter Bright wrote:
did all but 4092 and 5051.

Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Which patches do you need?

necessary:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5382 [regression 2.051] DLL multi-threading broken http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 const initializer cannot evaluate size of forward referenced alias http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 std.xml.Document.pretty saves empty elements with spaces and line breaks http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4598 std.xml check is too restrictive http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Bogus forward reference error with auto function

not show stoppers, but still nice to have:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4973 map file with spaces in file name passed without quotes to linker http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4328 templated unittests fail to link when instantiated from other file if compiler order isn't correct

convenient for debugging:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4486 CodeView debug info should contain absolute path names http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4014 CodeView debug type info not linked in from library http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5051 dmd flag for partial compilation - patch to write mixin expansions http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 type of enumerator values reduced to base type in debug info

I try to keep a few more changes uptodate with the repo (like the shared phobos related stuff), but these do not affect visuald.

Rainer

Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,

I cannot actually comment on the 64-bit version, but as it is probably also the candidate for dmd2.052 I'll take the opportunity to report on updating to the latest revision from github a couple of days ago. As I need a couple of patches, I cannot use the release version anyway. There were quite a few problems getting my project (visuald) to compile (on win32):

_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta


_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta


_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Reply via email to